<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-ups</title>
	<link>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/</link>
	<description>Startups, Entrepreneurs, and Consultants</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: SKMurphy &#187; EDA Bloggers&#8217; BoF at ICCAD 2008 Wed-Nov-12 4-6pm in Fir Room</title>
		<link>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/#comment-70441</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/#comment-70441</guid>
					<description>[...] A Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-ups [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-ups [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SKMurphy &#187; EDA Bloggers&#8217; BoF at ICCAD 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/#comment-68693</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/#comment-68693</guid>
					<description>[...] A Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-ups [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-ups [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SKMurphy &#187; What Happens When 70 EDA Blogs Become 500 in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/#comment-56536</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.skmurphy.com/blog/2008/06/30/a-primer-on-blogs-for-eda-start-ups/#comment-56536</guid>
					<description>[...] I just added Cadence to the list of companies with blogs on my May 28 post &amp;#8220;Bloggers Covering Design Automation.&amp;#8221; I didn&amp;#8217;t see any announcement but they appear to have re-designed their website in the last three or four weeks and now highlight a community of bloggers on their home page. My simple projection is that within three years every EDA company, large or small, will have at least one blog, and EDA consulting firms of all sizes will add a blog to their website. So that says we are on track to grow from 70 to over 500. I base this in part on the speed on adoption of the web by EDA firms and what&amp;#8217;s already happened for web startups and many other emerging technology spaces: entrepreneurs consider a blog a core component of their corporate identity. Making sense of 500 feeds will be no easier than surfing across 500 television channels to find something new and worth reading. I mentioned David Lin&amp;#8217;s experimental Netvibes page in my &amp;#8220;Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-Ups&amp;#8221; and it certainly represents a good start. But I think an opportunity exists for community lens approach similar to what Hacker News provides web entrepreneurs (which is different in some important but subtle ways from digg and reddit that allow it to avoid the death of the lowest common denominator topics migrating to the home page). Other models are certainly viable as well, based on forums, wikis, and new forms both emerging and yet to be invented. Paul Saffo&amp;#8217;s 1994 Wired article “It’s the Context Stupid” (also available on www.saffo.com/essays/contextstupid.php)  makes the point that the value is as much in providing context as the raw content. “It’s the content, stupid.” This catchy apothegm [is] now the mantra of an infant new media industry. […] As compelling as this phrase may be, it is also dead wrong. It is not content but context that will matter most a decade or so from now. The scarce resource will not be stuff, but point of view. […] The future belongs to neither the conduit or content players, but those who control the filtering, searching, and sense-making tools we will rely on to navigate through the expanses of cyberspace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I just added Cadence to the list of companies with blogs on my May 28 post &#8220;Bloggers Covering Design Automation.&#8221; I didn&#8217;t see any announcement but they appear to have re-designed their website in the last three or four weeks and now highlight a community of bloggers on their home page. My simple projection is that within three years every EDA company, large or small, will have at least one blog, and EDA consulting firms of all sizes will add a blog to their website. So that says we are on track to grow from 70 to over 500. I base this in part on the speed on adoption of the web by EDA firms and what&#8217;s already happened for web startups and many other emerging technology spaces: entrepreneurs consider a blog a core component of their corporate identity. Making sense of 500 feeds will be no easier than surfing across 500 television channels to find something new and worth reading. I mentioned David Lin&#8217;s experimental Netvibes page in my &#8220;Primer on Blogs for EDA Start-Ups&#8221; and it certainly represents a good start. But I think an opportunity exists for community lens approach similar to what Hacker News provides web entrepreneurs (which is different in some important but subtle ways from digg and reddit that allow it to avoid the death of the lowest common denominator topics migrating to the home page). Other models are certainly viable as well, based on forums, wikis, and new forms both emerging and yet to be invented. Paul Saffo&#8217;s 1994 Wired article “It’s the Context Stupid” (also available on <a href='http://www.saffo.com/essays/contextstupid.php' rel='nofollow'>www.saffo.com/essays/contextstupid.php</a>)  makes the point that the value is as much in providing context as the raw content. “It’s the content, stupid.” This catchy apothegm [is] now the mantra of an infant new media industry. […] As compelling as this phrase may be, it is also dead wrong. It is not content but context that will matter most a decade or so from now. The scarce resource will not be stuff, but point of view. […] The future belongs to neither the conduit or content players, but those who control the filtering, searching, and sense-making tools we will rely on to navigate through the expanses of cyberspace. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
